You are not logged in.
Culled and organized the post as much as i could. For now.
Last edited by ThaOneDon (2014-11-25 06:01:17)
Offline
Much better indeed. Nice
Offline
Updates 26/11/2014
Ambient Obscurance/Occlusion
*Hybrid Ambient Occlusion
*Factorized Point-Based Global Illumination
Meshes
*Sphere-Meshes: Shape Approximation using Spherical Quadric Error Metrics
Physics
*Newton Dynamics
Shaders
*Binary Shading using Appearance and Geometry
Last edited by ThaOneDon (2014-11-26 06:51:59)
Offline
Updates 27/11/2014
Audio
*YSE
Scripting
*Squirrel
Last edited by ThaOneDon (2014-11-27 08:46:41)
Offline
28/11/2014
Shaders
*Practical Particle Lighting
Shadow Maps
*Filter-based Real-time Single Scattering using Rectified Shadow Maps
Last edited by ThaOneDon (2014-11-28 20:17:44)
Offline
29/11/2014
Shaders
*SweetFX and GeDoSaTo
Last edited by ThaOneDon (2014-11-29 06:05:33)
Offline
1/12/2014
Engine Architecture
*Rendering Techniques in Disney's Split-Second
Anti-Aliasing
*SBAA
Shadow Mapping
*Adaptive Volumetric Shadow Maps
Last edited by ThaOneDon (2014-12-01 09:42:35)
Offline
2/12/2014
Anti-Aliasing
*CMAA - Its a good alternative to everything else, we should IMPLEMENT IT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE
Offline
Gonna add slightly to the list with this:
DOT Engine AI: https://github.com/MatrixCompSci/DOT
Oh my god... I found this forum by accident when looking up a paper on radiosity and someone mentioned my github....
This is the weirdest thing to happen to me in a while haha.
We just started adding Wiki pages btw describing in a LOT of detail exactly how the engine works, and exactly what the final version is going to do. We also have links to a bunch of papers
https://github.com/MatrixCompSci/DOT/wi … OT%27s--AI
Thanks btw! First forum post that I haven't made that mentions me :D (I've had tons of blog posts but those are less personal).
I can answer any question you have about the engine btw :P
Offline
spikeymikey0196 wrote:Gonna add slightly to the list with this:
DOT Engine AI: https://github.com/MatrixCompSci/DOTOh my god... I found this forum by accident when looking up a paper on radiosity and someone mentioned my github....
This is the weirdest thing to happen to me in a while haha.
We just started adding Wiki pages btw describing in a LOT of detail exactly how the engine works, and exactly what the final version is going to do. We also have links to a bunch of papers
https://github.com/MatrixCompSci/DOT/wi … OT%27s--AIThanks btw! First forum post that I haven't made that mentions me :D (I've had tons of blog posts but those are less personal).
I can answer any question you have about the engine btw :P
To be fair i think he just likes collecting them :P
Maybe you'll find something useful out of all that; but anyway, welcome to the forum :)
Offline
MatrixCompSci wrote:spikeymikey0196 wrote:Gonna add slightly to the list with this:
DOT Engine AI: https://github.com/MatrixCompSci/DOTOh my god... I found this forum by accident when looking up a paper on radiosity and someone mentioned my github....
This is the weirdest thing to happen to me in a while haha.
We just started adding Wiki pages btw describing in a LOT of detail exactly how the engine works, and exactly what the final version is going to do. We also have links to a bunch of papers
https://github.com/MatrixCompSci/DOT/wi … OT%27s--AIThanks btw! First forum post that I haven't made that mentions me :D (I've had tons of blog posts but those are less personal).
I can answer any question you have about the engine btw :P
To be fair i think he just likes collecting them :P
Maybe you'll find something useful out of all that; but anyway, welcome to the forum :)
That sounds very probable. I was confused why DOT was linked to by a shooter. The engine requires 4 hours-ish of computation to really start kicking into high gear. I don't imagine matches would last that long :P
I also hope this is just a compilation for your sake. This would be waaaaay too much on any graphics programmer :P
Last edited by MatrixCompSci (2014-12-04 01:05:55)
Offline
Yeah i'm quite confident the dev isn't really interested in implementing any of the assorted technologies and techniques here :P
Offline
Some similar stuff been implemented already.(from what i can see)
Last edited by ThaOneDon (2016-06-25 14:42:31)
Offline
Updates 5/12/2014
Meshes
*OpenRACM: Random-Accessible Compressed Meshes
Shaders
*Maximizing Depth Buffer Range and Precision
Any feedback on superior tech thats already included in Tesseract is appreciated. It helps me avoid adding anything to the blog thats not necessary.
Last edited by ThaOneDon (2014-12-05 10:40:48)
Offline
Updates 15/12/2014
Meshes
*CageIK: Dual-Laplacian Cage-Based Inverse Kinematics
Offline
Updates 18/12/2014
Physics
*Projective Dynamics: Fusing Constraint Projections
Scripting
*Goal-Oriented Action Planning (GOAP)
Last edited by ThaOneDon (2014-12-18 17:35:41)
Offline
Updates 09/01/2015
ReShade
Anti-Aliasing
*Amortized Supersampling
Shaders
*Geometry-Aware Framebuffer Level of Detail
*Genetic Programming for Shader Simplification
Last edited by ThaOneDon (2015-01-09 13:46:53)
Offline
i'm curious, if you don't use global illumination and deferred shading as two separate shaders, but instead create a one shader that has ray tracing and global illumination ray tracing into it, that would perhaps stop the weird light seams that occur on the edges of the inside of boxes? or would that be too cpu/gpu intensive? :3
Oh my god... I found this forum by accident when looking up a paper on radiosity and someone mentioned my github....
This is the weirdest thing to happen to me in a while haha.
We just started adding Wiki pages btw describing in a LOT of detail exactly how the engine works, and exactly what the final version is going to do. We also have links to a bunch of papers
https://github.com/MatrixCompSci/DOT/wi … OT%27s--AIThanks btw! First forum post that I haven't made that mentions me :D (I've had tons of blog posts but those are less personal).
I can answer any question you have about the engine btw :P
oh xD you're welcome btw :3 i saw it and i thought it had real promise ^_^ i get constant updates on the github so :3
Last edited by spikeymikey0196 (2015-01-12 16:37:54)
Offline
Updates 02/02/2015
Ambient Obscurance/Occlusion
Separable Subsurface Scattering
Anti-Aliasing
AGAA
Meshes
Dynamic Feature-Adaptive Subdivision
Last edited by ThaOneDon (2015-02-02 11:38:27)
Offline
10/02/2015
Removed bunch papers that were outdated/in use already/worse performing or simply irrelevant
All that remains are papers on tech thats better than whats in Tesseract on some aspects
Last edited by ThaOneDon (2015-02-10 15:39:27)
Offline
15/02/2015
Level-of-Detail(LOD)
GPU-Aware Hybrid Terrain Rendering
Screen-Space LOD. I suspect this what most of the industry is using. If not then they should be. Its incredible tech.
Physics
Rubikon (Source 2 Physics)(Valve)
Last edited by ThaOneDon (2015-02-15 14:40:50)
Offline
Do you have a paper on model lod and lod model switching (im sure there is a more advantageous way of saying that).
Offline
I'n not sure what you need. Models are meshes+textures that animate (extremely crude but simplistic explanation, theres more to it but thats the basics).
Look under Meshes and LOD on original post. Theres variety of ways to save performance. Most of it boils down to where and when you want your models to disappear from memory (distance, view-angle etc).
Tesseract uses MD5's (Doom 3/Quake 4 model format) but Lee Salzman did develop
Inter-Quake Model
http://sauerbraten.org/iqm/
Thou it was deemed unnecessary and dropped from Tesseract as i understand it.
Tesseract's Frustum Culling is extremely efficient.
Last edited by ThaOneDon (2015-02-16 12:15:52)
Offline
That is just flat-out incorrect and misinformed. IQM works fine and is still there.
Let me put a warning to all reading this thread: ThaOneDon does not in any way speak for or have knowledge of the development of Tesseract, nor does this thread reflect Tesseract's development priorities in any way.
Offline
What eihrul said.
That was just opinion by me. Not based on anything internal since i don't speak for Tesseract's devs nor represent anyone whos developing it.
To clarify, Tesseract supports IQMs what i was referring to was media files specific to Tesseract not using it. You can still use IQM's ingame if you want.
Last edited by ThaOneDon (2015-02-17 08:15:22)
Offline